Post-Bionian Blur Theory
Analysis, uncontained
Er Linsker
More and less excited by the catastrophe of change, their internal earth, like their internal world without the subject, flashes green, brown and blue, within the false limit of the body.
As their high dies down, their sense that the earth has other than affect, is neurodivergently affected, has an affectability that’s changing the world, grows un/conscious.
-
All returns to blackness. Aliveness, not growth, emerges from death. Like subjects almost subjects, more and less. Enactment discloses that it’s sex.
They open out on cosmic body, lead sexuality into sociality by way of sociability. What was that? Flesh is to body as earth is to world. The image of of. Intersubjective without the subject, an open field becomes a blur.
Applause arose, something on pay-per-view. Against individuation, living an experience together. Talking as dreaming. With difference without separability, with interest in without. Without Hejinian, Moten, Ogden, Ferreira da Silva.
=
The glitch they keep entering with a difference is entered by, sensing nothing human. All queer, the sky today, the stars in it, like dreams they can’t see. Dreaming breaks through the subject, constitutes it and doesn’t happen, because of the trauma of the concept. Dreaming’s queer.
They’ve grown interested in accepting the radicality of their ideas, as much as these brown leaves, caring only to belong to dispossession. Life and death, aliveness and deadness, are social, sexual.
Transference/countertransference is erotic. Projective identification is sublimation, sublimation being converted, lived and unlived, ecstasy. Différance without separability is the sexual death drive. Anaclisis sublimated sex.
-
Projective identification is finally losing its centrality, because its essence, its accident, presence, is decentering. Blackness remains. Suggestion is femme. Projective identification was the hottest thing they did until non-transferential analysis, being together, transference as energy.
Return to Ferenczi. At more and less than one meant emotional truth. If they believe intimidation comes from inside, they’re still the enemy.
Not a psychoanalysis of repression, dissociation, projective identification but a psychoanalysis of sublimation. Not of I-you-we-world but of they-she-we-earth. How to be glad to be with someone and how to be increasingly glad.
=
Identification with the alive. Getting together despite the world getting in the way of the earth. Sublimation is conversion, disordered. The ecstatic lives on in the sublime.
They’re trying to write intersubjective psychoanalysis without the subject by way of black study in prose poems. How to be pre/sent in sociality, sexuality. Sociality is sexuality.
Sexuality is sociality. Affectable and wanting to be, they surrender. If they believe containment isn’t a loss of presence, a going elsewhere inside oneself, making it as if there is an inside oneself, a oneself, they’re still the enemy.
-
Against containment, sharing. Availability, where if they’re not surrendering, they’re not available. They could say they used them narcissistically, but they’d rather say they played with them in a way where they barely existed, but they did play. Transitional objects help others too.
Against intervention, already being together. Not relational because not separate. Not two-person or -body because more and less than one and not person or body. Flesh psychotherapy, mutual analysis is playing. The patient is our best friend.